.jpg)
It is commonly deemed that games play an
increasingly pivotal role for children’s growth, which bestows marked benefits
upon the future life of our next generation. Yet whether conventional games are
more useful than modern ones in youngsters’ physical, mental, intellectual
development has sparked spirited debate. From my perspective, the boons brought
about by conventional games far outweigh the banes.
It is manifest that conventional games result
in numerous benefits. Owing to the fierce competitions at school, children, in
their formative years, need entertainment to balance the long sitting at desks.
Obviously, conventional games afford a break from the mental focus of academic
courses, which enable youngsters to relax their body and ease their mind.
Furthermore, conventional games are able to cultivate young adult a sense of
teamwork. Winning the game is not everything, cooperation in striving to win is
marvelous successful at help people to communicate efficiently, to trust in
each other, and to accept those who are different from themselves. These might
make them better prepared for their adult life and become better at decision
making and critical thinking.
However, conventional games do not come
without drawbacks. If everything children play in the game is exactly the same,
their world would really be dull and monotonous. As the saying goes,” nothing
endures except change.” No matter how wonderful certain traditional game is,
the same without any innovation will lose attraction among young people sooner
or later. On the other hand, modern computer games are more likely to measure
up to various expectations of adolescents, thereby putting a new patch on the
previous programs, from which students can learn computer application
abilities.
In the final analysis, I concede that although
modern games have something unique, traditional ones are more blessings to
offspring. On balance, children need to do their utmost to honor modern
technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment